Cause: a principle, aim, or movement to which one is committed and prepared to defend or advocate.
The justice of our cause must be reflected in the manner in which we rectify the crimes of our past.
Unknown
Committed: pledged or bound to a certain course or policy; dedicated.
Fate is nothing else but the deeds committed in a prior state of existence.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
My pal Jeff knows how to get stuff done. Me,
I often doodle. A bit of work here, some over there, seldom will I sit down, do
only one thing at a time and finish it. Don’t get me wrong, I do get stuff
done, but I’m all over the show. Not Jeff. When he takes on something new, no
matter what it is, it’s as if this spell comes over him. He has the focus of
twenty bulls all gunning for the same red flag. Nothing unsettles him until his
goal or the desired results are achieved.
I admire that. But, there have also been
times that Jeff is so focussed on the task at hand, that he has little or no
room for anybody else’s input. It makes working with him, especially under
pressure, often very awkward.
Too much of a good thing - isn’t a good
thing.
After some thought and analysis, perhaps this
is the only substantial point one is forced to deduce from the latest ‘Noah’
movie. In it, Director Darren Aronofsky tells the tale of a man who will stop
at nothing to fulfil the task set before him, come hell or high water.
(Mmmmh)
Noah was the man God commissioned to build an
ark before He was going to wipe out mankind with a huge flood because of all
their wickedness. In choosing Noah, He had the perfect ally to see the job
through, a man He could trust to stay committed to His cause. But when you
observe Aronofsky’s interpretation of Noah and the times leading up before the
great flood, you have to gasp at the realities he tries to sketch to his
audience.
His Noah (Russell Crowe) comes across like a
man possessed, blinded by some twisted idea of what it means to show your
spiritual loyalty and devotion. In fact, his reasons for doing what God told
him to do seems very much his own and hardly divine.
There are many inconsistencies in Aronofsky’s version of events. Inconsistencies that he tries to cover up with CGI stunts and
tricks, he even offers a 3D experience of this absurd historical account of
his. But I put it to you; no amount of colourful tailoring to any version can
influence a bad story enough to make it seem true.
Noah starts having these visions or back
flashes, as if he is on some psychedelic trip – which mind you, according to
Aronofsky, is quite likely how Noah got some of his answers. During a visit,
his great grandfather Methuselah (Anthony Hopkins) promptly serves him up a
natural mind-bending substance, and off Noah flies, zonked out of his skull.
(Got to wonder about this family)
God spoke to Noah. He never had visions,
especially not on some ancient form of dope anyway. All of them, both Noah and his
sons, already had wives, too. Not according to this movie. It therefore doesn’t
come as much of a surprise that God is silent in this film, a silence which at
times is deafening.
For those unfamiliar with the story of Noah,
it’s easy to simply go read all about it in Genesis 6-9. Basically, the Earth
and all its inhabitants were so evil and corrupt that God was sorrowful for
creating man, ‘And the Lord was sorry that He made man on the earth and He was
grieved in His heart.’ (NKJV)
God had enough and decided to destroy
everything and everyone He had made, but Noah found favour. When you watch
‘Noah’, you can’t help but wonder why? For instance: Upon learning of his son’s girlfriend’s
pregnancy, (that’s all she is in the movie), he bluntly says that if it’s a
boy, the baby can live, if a girl – she has to die.
Besides making history for being the first
person ever to suffer from major cabin fever, Noah is also a drug taking
fanatic and the ultimate chauvinist to whom female life has little or no value;
hardly befitting of a man who was chosen to rectify the crimes of our past.
The simple truth obviously just isn’t
entertaining enough, perhaps why the creators of this story try to take it to a
completely new level. In between, Aronofsky tries to portray Noah as a man deeply
tormented by what he has to do and tries to convince us that his character’s
actions stem from human error and fallibility, almost as if he trying to set
the tone for his own directional and storytelling imperfections, while trying
to find forgiveness and redemption from us.
Ordinarily, creative license inspires, it
offers something fresh. In this instance, it hopelessly fails.
‘Noah’ is a soulless journey, by soulless
people in a soulless world who by virtue of inference suffer under a soulless
God. With so much soullessness in this movie, you can’t help but wonder about
the director – you surely don’t have to wonder about the message or the film.